Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represent one of the most persistent and widely distributed classes of synthetic chemicals, with the U.S. EPA’s CompTox Dashboard PFAS Master List identifying more than 12,000 individual compounds across industrial, consumer, and environmental uses. Their strong carbon–fluorine bonds make them highly resistant to degradation, earning the name “forever chemicals.” PFAS have been detected in groundwater, food packaging, soils, and even human serum samples worldwide.
Mounting evidence links PFAS exposure to cancer, immune suppression, and developmental harm. Regulators are responding with ultra-trace limits that require advanced analytical methods:
- In April 2024, the U.S. EPA finalized enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) of 4 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water, the most stringent national standards to date.
- The European Union Drinking Water Directive (Directive (EU) 2020/2184) requires monitoring of 20 PFAS with a combined limit of 100 ng/L (100 ppt) and establishes a broader sum parameter of 500 ng/L (500 ppt) for total PFAS.
- Countries including Canada, Australia, and Japan have adopted similar thresholds, often in the 10–100 ng/L (10–100 ppt) range, underscoring a global shift toward harmonized ultra-trace PFAS monitoring.
At these concentrations, contamination from sampling gear or even lab air can distort results. Ultra-trace detection methods are, therefore, essential not only for compliance but also for public health protection and risk management.
Core Analytical Techniques for PFAS Detection
Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
LC-MS/MS remains the gold standard for targeted PFAS quantification in water, soils, and biological samples. Regulatory methods such as the EPA 537.1 and 533 rely on LC-MS/MS with solid-phase extraction (SPE) to achieve detection in the low ppt and sub-ppt range. Isotopically labeled internal standards ensure accuracy. Its limitation is that it only quantifies PFAS with available reference standards.
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)
HRMS enables both targeted analysis and discovery of novel PFAS through suspect and non-targeted screening. Its resolving power allows identification of isomers and emerging PFAS not covered by regulatory lists. While powerful, it requires costly instrumentation and expertise in advanced data interpretation.
Total Oxidizable Precursor (TOP) Assay
TOP assays chemically oxidize precursor PFAS into terminal perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), revealing hidden contamination that targeted LC-MS/MS would miss. Although oxidation is sometimes incomplete, this method provides valuable insights into the “total PFAS burden” in a sample.
Adsorbable Organic Fluorine (AOF) and Extractable Organic Fluorine (EOF)
These techniques measure total organic fluorine using combustion ion chromatography (CIC). They are effective for screening food, packaging, or water samples, where fluorinated compounds may be present but not fully characterized. However, AOF and EOF lack specificity because they also capture non-PFAS fluorinated substances.
Non-Targeted Screening (NTS) and Suspect Analysis
Leveraging HRMS with predictive workflows and spectral databases, this approach identifies emerging PFAS species beyond current regulatory lists. Confirmation typically requires synthesis of standards, but the method is essential for future-proofing monitoring programs as PFAS lists expand.
| Method | Detection Limits | Strengths | Limitations | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC-MS/MS | ppt to sub-ppt | Regulatory gold standard; highly sensitive | Limited to known analytes | Drinking water (EPA 537.1, 533), soils, serum |
| HRMS | ppt (targeted); variable (non-targeted) | Identifies novel PFAS, resolves isomers | Expensive; complex interpretation | Industrial effluents, research, product testing |
| TOP Assay | Semi-quantitative | Captures hidden PFAS precursors | Incomplete oxidation possible | Liability assessments, source tracking |
| AOF/EOF | Low µg/L to ppt (matrix-dependent) | Captures total organic fluorine | Non-specific, includes non-PFAS | Screening of water, food packaging |
| Non-Targeted Screening | Variable (ppt possible) | Expands detection beyond lists | Requires spectral libraries and standards | Emerging PFAS monitoring, regulatory research |
Sampling and Contamination Control
At ppt-level sensitivity, contamination prevention is just as important as analytical technique:
- Consumables: PFAS can leach from PTFE ot Teflon™ tubing, coated containers, or even gloves. Though the EPA methods recommend using high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or polypropylene bottles, there is scarce data on how this choice may mitigate the risk.
- Field practices: Certified PFAS-free water, PFAS-free bottles, and rigorous use of blanks (field, trip, and method) are critical to distinguish true signals from background contamination.
- Laboratory practices: Method blanks, isotopically labeled surrogates, and instrument rinsing confirm accuracy. Many labs also designate PFAS-free workspaces to minimize airborne contamination.
- Why it matters: Without these precautions, false positives or invalidated results can undermine compliance and client trust.
Regulatory Methods and Standards
Validated methods ensure defensibility and comparability of results:
- EPA 537.1 and 533: LC-MS/MS methods targeting 18+ PFAS in drinking water at ppt levels.
- EPA Draft Method 1633 (2023): First validated multi-matrix PFAS method, covering wastewater, biosolids, soil, and tissue, and expected to become the compliance benchmark.
- ISO 21675:2019: International standard for PFAS in water using SPE and LC-MS/MS.
- ASTM initiatives: Standards in development (e.g., WK69815, WK82307) to expand PFAS guidance into consumer products and industrial effluents.
- Implication for labs: Staying aligned with these evolving standards ensures results are legally defensible and meet client expectations across global markets.
How Contract Labs Can Help
As detection limits drop into the ppt range and validated methods expand across multiple matrices, PFAS testing has become one of the most technically demanding areas of environmental and product safety analysis. Establishing in-house capacity requires significant capital investment and expertise, making outsourcing a practical and often necessary option.
Contract laboratories provide validated, multi-matrix PFAS testing using LC-MS/MS, HRMS, TOP assays, and complementary approaches. Their expertise in contamination control, QA/QC, and regulatory alignment (EPA, ISO, ASTM) ensures results that are both accurate and defensible.
If you’re looking for ultra-trace PFAS analysis—or considering outsourcing—partnering with a qualified laboratory offers the assurance of compliance today and readiness for tomorrow’s regulatory landscape.
Submit a free lab request to our improved marketplace and get in direct touch with expert labs quickly and securely.
This content includes text that has been generated with the assistance of AI. Contract Laboratory encourages the use of new tools and technologies that enhance our editorial process. Our full editorial policy can be found here.