Environmental testing laboratories are at the center of one of the most consequential regulatory shifts in recent years. The US EPA finalized its first national drinking-water standards for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in April 2024, setting enforceable maximum contaminant levels of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS and introducing hazard-index thresholds for mixtures. These standards ripple far beyond water testing, influencing materials, consumer products, and industrial supply chains.

On the other hand, the European Union’s (EU’s) Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and restrictions on intentionally added microplastics are reshaping how labs test for trace contaminants and evaluate product lifecycles. Environmental labs are, therefore, expected not only to deliver trace-level detection but also to provide structured, reproducible data that regulators, industries, and the public can trust.

Core Trends Reshaping Test Menus

1. PFAS Detection at Trace Levels

PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” are now subject to some of the most stringent regulatory limits ever set. Labs must adapt workflows for ultra-trace detection using LC-MS/MS and high-resolution MS methods that meet the EPA-approved protocols. The challenge is not only sensitivity but also ensuring method validation, uncertainty quantification, and field-to-lab data integrity.

A lot is changing in consumer products, pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals, environmental testing, metals and mining, food and beverage, medical devices, and cross-industry innovations.

If you are a third-party or contract testing lab, you need to know why the sector is shifting, the core trends reshaping test menus and methods, and the recent developments affecting operations, so you can take practical steps now to stay competitive.

Get a sector-by-sector look at the trends shaping laboratory testing in 2025 and beyond. Download the cross-industry playbook for insights into digital readiness and sustainable lab practices.

Access the eBook

2. Microplastics and Non-Target Screening

The EU’s ban on intentionally added microplastics has broadened test menus for particle identification and contamination control. In parallel, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) suspect and non-target screening is becoming a practical bridge between unknown risks and targeted quantification, provided the metadata and reporting structures are rigorously maintained.

3. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Practices

Environmental labs are under pressure to demonstrate sustainable operations, including reduced solvent consumption, energy-efficient instruments, and waste-minimization practices. Accreditation bodies and clients increasingly expect laboratories to align with green chemistry principles and document carbon-reduction efforts.

4. Digital Threads and Metadata Integrity

Regulators are rewarding labs that maintain complete digital chains of custody from field collection through analysis and reporting. This means structured, machine-readable Certificates of Analysis (CoAs), integration of geographic information system (GIS) data, and seamless transfer of metadata across instruments, LIMS, and reporting platforms.

Recent Developments Affecting Lab Operations

  • Expanded EPA and EU guidance on PFAS test methods, requiring consistent QA/QC validation protocols across labs.
  • Increasing reliance on automated sampling and monitoring technologies, such as remote sensors that feed directly into lab systems.
  • Demand for cross-sector environmental evidence, with PFAS and microplastics testing required for consumer goods, food contact materials, and medical supply chains.

Practical Steps for Third-Party Labs

To remain competitive and compliant in environmental testing, labs should:

  • Invest in HRMS platforms capable of trace-level PFAS detection and flexible enough for non-target screening.
  • Validate microplastics workflows using FTIR or Raman microscopy, ensuring particle ID methods meet regulatory standards.
  • Strengthen metadata capture from field to final report, embedding uncertainty, chain of custody, and sample provenance into LIMS records.
  • Adopt sustainability practices in lab operations, aligning with client ESG goals and accreditation expectations.
  • Prepare for cross-sector demand, as PFAS and microplastics testing increasingly extend beyond environmental labs into consumer and industrial sectors.

Environmental testing laboratories are moving into an era where trace-level detection, metadata integrity, and sustainability are defining success. By strengthening PFAS and microplastics capabilities, investing in HRMS and digital traceability, and embedding green chemistry principles, labs can position themselves not only as regulators’ partners in compliance but also as key players in supporting industry-wide sustainability goals.

Are you an environmental laboratory looking to expand your clientele?

Register your lab today on our new and improved platform. Get enhanced visibility and communicate directly and securely with requesters—It’s quick and easy!

Explore Contract Laboratory for the latest lab testing requests along with expert insights on industry happenings.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Author

  • Swathi Kodaikal, MSc, holds a master’s degree in biotechnology and has worked in places where actual science and research happen. Blending her love for writing with science, Swathi enjoys demystifying complex research findings for readers from all walks of life. On the days she's not writing, she learns and performs Kathak, sings, makes plans to travel, and obsesses over cleanliness.

    View all posts